<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Look: Redline R530 Comfort Commuter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/</link>
	<description>Tips, Hints, Reviews and Safety for Bike Commuters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:00:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2whls3spds</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/comment-page-1/#comment-359000</link>
		<dc:creator>2whls3spds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/#comment-359000</guid>
		<description>Update on my Redline :D

Still rolling it. I did manage to source a dyno hub for roller brakes from WorkBikes in Amsterdam, NL.

Still working on ditching the suspension fork.

I posted a bit over 3 years ago. I am still happy with the bike. Unfortunately Redline and Torker have discontinued it.

Aaron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update on my Redline <img src='http://www.commutebybike.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Still rolling it. I did manage to source a dyno hub for roller brakes from WorkBikes in Amsterdam, NL.</p>
<p>Still working on ditching the suspension fork.</p>
<p>I posted a bit over 3 years ago. I am still happy with the bike. Unfortunately Redline and Torker have discontinued it.</p>
<p>Aaron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiropody manchester</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/comment-page-1/#comment-169039</link>
		<dc:creator>chiropody manchester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/#comment-169039</guid>
		<description>Excellent ideas here, have emailed my mum so expect a big reply!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent ideas here, have emailed my mum so expect a big reply!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2whls3spds</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/comment-page-1/#comment-82115</link>
		<dc:creator>2whls3spds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/#comment-82115</guid>
		<description>I just purchased an R 530...I have been cycling for over 35 years. I agree the suspension seat post is not necessary nor the suspension fork. I replaced the stock seat post and saddle with my usual Brooks B-67 and an alloy seat post.  I would have much rather had an on board lighting system. AFAIK they don&#039;t make a generator hub that is compatible with the roller brakes. I have chosen to piece together my own lighting system using the B&amp;M DLumotec Oval N Plus headlight (LED w/ Standlight) a Spanniga Vector Xs tail light (LED w/standlight) and a B&amp;M sidewall generator. I have considered ditching the suspension fork, switch to V brakes and using a Nexus generator hub....but I really like the all weather ability of the roller brake. Sturmey Archer makes a drum brake/generator hub combo and I think Shimano is missing the boat by not offering one. I still feel that the R 530 is an excellent value for the dollar, and Redline dealers are much easier to come by than Breezer. The closest stocking Breezer dealer to me is over 12 hours away. FWIW this bike is a &quot;replacement&quot; for my old Raleigh Sports that has been my most used bike for over 25 years. I wanted something off the shelf, and not outrageously expensive. I consider the price of the R 530 to be fair in comparison to similar models from other companies, and with in range (inflation adjusted) of what my Raleigh cost new in the early &#039;70&#039;s.

Aaron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just purchased an R 530&#8230;I have been cycling for over 35 years. I agree the suspension seat post is not necessary nor the suspension fork. I replaced the stock seat post and saddle with my usual Brooks B-67 and an alloy seat post.  I would have much rather had an on board lighting system. AFAIK they don&#8217;t make a generator hub that is compatible with the roller brakes. I have chosen to piece together my own lighting system using the B&amp;M DLumotec Oval N Plus headlight (LED w/ Standlight) a Spanniga Vector Xs tail light (LED w/standlight) and a B&amp;M sidewall generator. I have considered ditching the suspension fork, switch to V brakes and using a Nexus generator hub&#8230;.but I really like the all weather ability of the roller brake. Sturmey Archer makes a drum brake/generator hub combo and I think Shimano is missing the boat by not offering one. I still feel that the R 530 is an excellent value for the dollar, and Redline dealers are much easier to come by than Breezer. The closest stocking Breezer dealer to me is over 12 hours away. FWIW this bike is a &#8220;replacement&#8221; for my old Raleigh Sports that has been my most used bike for over 25 years. I wanted something off the shelf, and not outrageously expensive. I consider the price of the R 530 to be fair in comparison to similar models from other companies, and with in range (inflation adjusted) of what my Raleigh cost new in the early &#8217;70&#8242;s.</p>
<p>Aaron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/comment-page-1/#comment-75564</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/#comment-75564</guid>
		<description>I guess I should also point out that Bakfiets use the Nexus roller brakes.  If they can stop a 90 pound bike plus (up to) 200lbs of cargo, they&#039;ll probably do OK for this bike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I should also point out that Bakfiets use the Nexus roller brakes.  If they can stop a 90 pound bike plus (up to) 200lbs of cargo, they&#8217;ll probably do OK for this bike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McAngryPants</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/comment-page-1/#comment-75559</link>
		<dc:creator>McAngryPants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/#comment-75559</guid>
		<description>pretty.  but for $88 my wife uses this to go to and from the store...

http://www.xyzbikes.com/catalog/268243-lady-easyrider-beach-cruiser-pink-p-85.html?osCsid=396dff7569c2f037e00d5958f9aafb03</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pretty.  but for $88 my wife uses this to go to and from the store&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.xyzbikes.com/catalog/268243-lady-easyrider-beach-cruiser-pink-p-85.html?osCsid=396dff7569c2f037e00d5958f9aafb03" rel="nofollow">http://www.xyzbikes.com/catalog/268243-lady-easyrider-beach-cruiser-pink-p-85.html?osCsid=396dff7569c2f037e00d5958f9aafb03</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/comment-page-1/#comment-75553</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/#comment-75553</guid>
		<description>The Nexus roller brakes are perfectly fine...not as incredible as discs, but they do the job.  I rode a friend&#039;s Giant or Specialized &quot;city bike&quot; when Nexus hubs were brand new to the market, and I remember that adjusting the roller brakes was a bit of a nightmare once the cable stretched, but otherwise worked fine.

Looks like a good bike with decent (and perfectly appropriate -- Redline is listening to us!!!) accessories near the right price point.  Right on, Redline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nexus roller brakes are perfectly fine&#8230;not as incredible as discs, but they do the job.  I rode a friend&#8217;s Giant or Specialized &#8220;city bike&#8221; when Nexus hubs were brand new to the market, and I remember that adjusting the roller brakes was a bit of a nightmare once the cable stretched, but otherwise worked fine.</p>
<p>Looks like a good bike with decent (and perfectly appropriate &#8212; Redline is listening to us!!!) accessories near the right price point.  Right on, Redline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/comment-page-1/#comment-75550</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/#comment-75550</guid>
		<description>I also think that a front suspension with 38mm tires is overkill.  I&#039;d also trade the suspension seatpost for a good sprung saddle, too.  Plus, the front suspension will make it pretty difficult to mount a rack to the front.  I think you may be limited to a handlebar basket there.

The site lists tektro brakes up front, but only saw what looked like roller brakes up there.  My Trek L200 has V brakes on the front and a roller brake on the back.  The roller brake doesn&#039;t have that grabby feeling, it&#039;s a lot more progressive than that.  Overall, it might be a bit less powerful than caliper brakes, but nothing that I&#039;d really notice.  I can still skid the rear tire if I want to.  The nice thing is that it always works the same in the dry, rain, snow, ice, etc.  A big plus for a car replacement in my book.

As far as the chain case goes, I can pop the chain case on my L200 with a flat blade screwdriver or a house key, so it takes about 30 seconds tops.  On the other hand, removing the rear wheel is a bit of a PITA (my L200 has a Nexus 8). After having done it a couple of times at home to adjust the non-drive cone and to add the studs for the winter, I could probably get it on and off in about 30 minutes.  It&#039;s not that it&#039;s overly mechanically complex (well a little), but it is a bit fiddly.  Basically, the procedure is pop the QR cable out of the roller brake, remove the bolt that holds the roller brake reaction arm to the chainstay, shift to 1st gear, rotate cassette joint (shifter on the hub) around to release tension and remove cable, use needle nose pliers to remove cable from cable guide into the cassette joint, loosen nuts on wheel with adjustable wrench, remove chain if necessary (I end up removing from both the chainring and the rear cog as the L200 has track dropouts) remove wheel.  Installation is reverse of disassembly. Tools required are phillips head screwdriver, adjustable wrench and needle nose pliers for guiding the shifter cable into the cassette joint cable guide.  My personal opinion is that any shop that sells its customers a bike with a gear hub should show them how to remove the rear wheel.  Either the customer is happy and learns something, or the shop gets extra business because the customer brings it back to them every time they get a flat.

I also agree that puncture resistant tires are the way to go.  As time consuming as it is to remove the rear on a Nexus setup, Schwalbe Marathons of some variety should be standard.

All that said, I&#039;m just pleased as punch that someone else is offering a full chaincase gear hub bike.  This would be a great car replacement for trips 3-5 miles and under if you want to wear plain clothes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think that a front suspension with 38mm tires is overkill.  I&#8217;d also trade the suspension seatpost for a good sprung saddle, too.  Plus, the front suspension will make it pretty difficult to mount a rack to the front.  I think you may be limited to a handlebar basket there.</p>
<p>The site lists tektro brakes up front, but only saw what looked like roller brakes up there.  My Trek L200 has V brakes on the front and a roller brake on the back.  The roller brake doesn&#8217;t have that grabby feeling, it&#8217;s a lot more progressive than that.  Overall, it might be a bit less powerful than caliper brakes, but nothing that I&#8217;d really notice.  I can still skid the rear tire if I want to.  The nice thing is that it always works the same in the dry, rain, snow, ice, etc.  A big plus for a car replacement in my book.</p>
<p>As far as the chain case goes, I can pop the chain case on my L200 with a flat blade screwdriver or a house key, so it takes about 30 seconds tops.  On the other hand, removing the rear wheel is a bit of a PITA (my L200 has a Nexus 8). After having done it a couple of times at home to adjust the non-drive cone and to add the studs for the winter, I could probably get it on and off in about 30 minutes.  It&#8217;s not that it&#8217;s overly mechanically complex (well a little), but it is a bit fiddly.  Basically, the procedure is pop the QR cable out of the roller brake, remove the bolt that holds the roller brake reaction arm to the chainstay, shift to 1st gear, rotate cassette joint (shifter on the hub) around to release tension and remove cable, use needle nose pliers to remove cable from cable guide into the cassette joint, loosen nuts on wheel with adjustable wrench, remove chain if necessary (I end up removing from both the chainring and the rear cog as the L200 has track dropouts) remove wheel.  Installation is reverse of disassembly. Tools required are phillips head screwdriver, adjustable wrench and needle nose pliers for guiding the shifter cable into the cassette joint cable guide.  My personal opinion is that any shop that sells its customers a bike with a gear hub should show them how to remove the rear wheel.  Either the customer is happy and learns something, or the shop gets extra business because the customer brings it back to them every time they get a flat.</p>
<p>I also agree that puncture resistant tires are the way to go.  As time consuming as it is to remove the rear on a Nexus setup, Schwalbe Marathons of some variety should be standard.</p>
<p>All that said, I&#8217;m just pleased as punch that someone else is offering a full chaincase gear hub bike.  This would be a great car replacement for trips 3-5 miles and under if you want to wear plain clothes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/comment-page-1/#comment-75542</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/#comment-75542</guid>
		<description>I would trade the suspension for some lights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would trade the suspension for some lights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/comment-page-1/#comment-75515</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/#comment-75515</guid>
		<description>Justin makes some good points.  My personal peeve with the US bike industry on these types of bikes is that they are specified to have the most &quot;features&quot; a sales person can talk about.  Well, by these types, I mean more affordable bikes in the sub-$1000 range and all styles.  When I used to design/spec bikes, my sales manager would have had a cow if I proposed any bike in the comfort/hybrid category (this was before the industry affixed &quot;commuter&quot; as a style), without a suspension fork or seat post.  Features, we have to have features.  

So, what happened is that bike shops also saw this and having these &quot;features&quot; made it easier to sell.  It is infinitely easier to sell a bike based on features you can touch rather than features that are intangible - like its fun to ride a bike.  

Back to this bike, lower end suspension forks and suspension seat posts are heavy and clunky.  Maybe look good on a sales floor, but after a while, their function falls way off.  Who wants to spend $50 to overhaul a fork that originally cost the manufacturer $15?  

With the riders&#039; weight fairly rearward biased, the suspension fork doesn&#039;t really do much.  With the riders&#039; weight fairly rearward biased, the suspension seat post pretty much stays loaded.  There is probably more &quot;travel&quot; in that seat than in the post.  The best thing that they can do on this bike is to use a good tire that will give you your overall ride quality by virtue of its air volume.  

On a bike like the Redline (which is a very nice bike and a great move for Redline), it is very close to being a stellar commuter.  However, what Redline did was essentially take their hybrid and add a rack, fenders and chaincase.  Now if they could ditch the suspension bits, adjustable stem, add a dynamo...it would be a stellar move.

Did I just rant?  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin makes some good points.  My personal peeve with the US bike industry on these types of bikes is that they are specified to have the most &#8220;features&#8221; a sales person can talk about.  Well, by these types, I mean more affordable bikes in the sub-$1000 range and all styles.  When I used to design/spec bikes, my sales manager would have had a cow if I proposed any bike in the comfort/hybrid category (this was before the industry affixed &#8220;commuter&#8221; as a style), without a suspension fork or seat post.  Features, we have to have features.  </p>
<p>So, what happened is that bike shops also saw this and having these &#8220;features&#8221; made it easier to sell.  It is infinitely easier to sell a bike based on features you can touch rather than features that are intangible &#8211; like its fun to ride a bike.  </p>
<p>Back to this bike, lower end suspension forks and suspension seat posts are heavy and clunky.  Maybe look good on a sales floor, but after a while, their function falls way off.  Who wants to spend $50 to overhaul a fork that originally cost the manufacturer $15?  </p>
<p>With the riders&#8217; weight fairly rearward biased, the suspension fork doesn&#8217;t really do much.  With the riders&#8217; weight fairly rearward biased, the suspension seat post pretty much stays loaded.  There is probably more &#8220;travel&#8221; in that seat than in the post.  The best thing that they can do on this bike is to use a good tire that will give you your overall ride quality by virtue of its air volume.  </p>
<p>On a bike like the Redline (which is a very nice bike and a great move for Redline), it is very close to being a stellar commuter.  However, what Redline did was essentially take their hybrid and add a rack, fenders and chaincase.  Now if they could ditch the suspension bits, adjustable stem, add a dynamo&#8230;it would be a stellar move.</p>
<p>Did I just rant?  <img src='http://www.commutebybike.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoelGuelph</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/comment-page-1/#comment-75498</link>
		<dc:creator>JoelGuelph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commutebybike.com/2008/02/19/first-look-redline-r530-comfort-commuter/#comment-75498</guid>
		<description>I love the chaincase.  Way to go Redline.  For the number of times that the rear wheel will need to come off these bikes, the hassle is worth the cleaner drivetrain.

I think the suspension will help get people on the bike.  They may realize they don&#039;t want it after they actually commute on it a few times, but I bet it will help make the sale.  And OEM suspension forks of that quality don&#039;t cost much more than rigid forks.    

No comments on the roller brakes?  They seem like a great idea in theory, but I have never ridden them myself or really seen many &#039;in the wild&#039;.  Anyone know how strong/reliable/weather resistant they are.  My guess is that they aren&#039;t a strong as discs or v-brakes in dry weather, but they are consistent through all weather conditions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the chaincase.  Way to go Redline.  For the number of times that the rear wheel will need to come off these bikes, the hassle is worth the cleaner drivetrain.</p>
<p>I think the suspension will help get people on the bike.  They may realize they don&#8217;t want it after they actually commute on it a few times, but I bet it will help make the sale.  And OEM suspension forks of that quality don&#8217;t cost much more than rigid forks.    </p>
<p>No comments on the roller brakes?  They seem like a great idea in theory, but I have never ridden them myself or really seen many &#8216;in the wild&#8217;.  Anyone know how strong/reliable/weather resistant they are.  My guess is that they aren&#8217;t a strong as discs or v-brakes in dry weather, but they are consistent through all weather conditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

