<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cyclists Subsidize Motorists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/03/09/cyclists-subsidize-motorists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/03/09/cyclists-subsidize-motorists/</link>
	<description>Tips, Hints, Reviews and Safety for Bike Commuters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/03/09/cyclists-subsidize-motorists/comment-page-1/#comment-168193</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commutebybike.com/2008/03/09/cyclists-subsidize-motorists/#comment-168193</guid>
		<description>Hi there, I dont know if I am writing in a proper board but I have got a problem with activation, link i receive in email is not working...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, I dont know if I am writing in a proper board but I have got a problem with activation, link i receive in email is not working&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JiMCi</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/03/09/cyclists-subsidize-motorists/comment-page-1/#comment-78011</link>
		<dc:creator>JiMCi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commutebybike.com/2008/03/09/cyclists-subsidize-motorists/#comment-78011</guid>
		<description>Cyclists subsidize motorists... what about truckers?

&quot;One legal 80,000 pound GVW tractor-trailer truck does as much damage to road pavement as 9,600 cars. (Highway Research Board, NAS, 1962).&quot;

&quot;Overweight trucks chronically underpay their fair share of taxes and user fees for the repair of U.S. roads and bridges. By damaging roads, large trucks further degrade highway safety. (U.S. DOT, 1997).&quot;

I wonder how many (million) bikes are required to damage the roads as much as one single truck does?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cyclists subsidize motorists&#8230; what about truckers?</p>
<p>&#8220;One legal 80,000 pound GVW tractor-trailer truck does as much damage to road pavement as 9,600 cars. (Highway Research Board, NAS, 1962).&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Overweight trucks chronically underpay their fair share of taxes and user fees for the repair of U.S. roads and bridges. By damaging roads, large trucks further degrade highway safety. (U.S. DOT, 1997).&#8221;</p>
<p>I wonder how many (million) bikes are required to damage the roads as much as one single truck does?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Braggins</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/03/09/cyclists-subsidize-motorists/comment-page-1/#comment-77984</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Braggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commutebybike.com/2008/03/09/cyclists-subsidize-motorists/#comment-77984</guid>
		<description>&gt; (and presumably freight delivery but I&#039;m not as sure about that)

There&#039;s an argument that building roads that can handle freight delivery should be paid for by the freight companies (and, eventually, the people buying the delivered goods), not by taxpayers in general. Especially if effectively subsidised road freight is competing against unsubsidised rail freight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; (and presumably freight delivery but I&#8217;m not as sure about that)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an argument that building roads that can handle freight delivery should be paid for by the freight companies (and, eventually, the people buying the delivered goods), not by taxpayers in general. Especially if effectively subsidised road freight is competing against unsubsidised rail freight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2008/03/09/cyclists-subsidize-motorists/comment-page-1/#comment-77953</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commutebybike.com/2008/03/09/cyclists-subsidize-motorists/#comment-77953</guid>
		<description>A major portion of the cost of gasloline here in Canada is government tax.  Since I no longer own a car I happily don&#039;t give any tax dollars collected from fuel.  Directly that is.  Of course they get it from me in other ways.  

The city I live in spent $250 million on roads in 2007 and has budgeted $400 million for 2008 (city population is 1 million).  The money comes directly from property tax they collect.  It&#039;s absolutely absurd.  then they announce out of the other side of their mouths that there is not enough $$$ to upgrade our public transit system.  

Our federal government put a program into place where gas guzzler vehicles have a $1000 surcharge added to the price, normal cars did not receive the surcharge and people that purchased cars that get better than average mileage got a $1000  rebate.  What did I receive for not even driving a car?  You guessed it.

&quot;Cyclists Subsidize Motorists&quot;?  BIG Time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A major portion of the cost of gasloline here in Canada is government tax.  Since I no longer own a car I happily don&#8217;t give any tax dollars collected from fuel.  Directly that is.  Of course they get it from me in other ways.  </p>
<p>The city I live in spent $250 million on roads in 2007 and has budgeted $400 million for 2008 (city population is 1 million).  The money comes directly from property tax they collect.  It&#8217;s absolutely absurd.  then they announce out of the other side of their mouths that there is not enough $$$ to upgrade our public transit system.  </p>
<p>Our federal government put a program into place where gas guzzler vehicles have a $1000 surcharge added to the price, normal cars did not receive the surcharge and people that purchased cars that get better than average mileage got a $1000  rebate.  What did I receive for not even driving a car?  You guessed it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Cyclists Subsidize Motorists&#8221;?  BIG Time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
