<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Advocate&#8217;s Dilemma: A National Bike Summit Warm-Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/03/03/the-advocates-dilemma-a-national-bike-summit-warm-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/03/03/the-advocates-dilemma-a-national-bike-summit-warm-up/</link>
	<description>Tips, Hints, Reviews and Safety for Bike Commuters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 01:08:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ceti</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/03/03/the-advocates-dilemma-a-national-bike-summit-warm-up/comment-page-1/#comment-275431</link>
		<dc:creator>ceti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 06:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commutebybike.com/?p=8858#comment-275431</guid>
		<description>Helmets are a case in point of the oversecuritization of bicycling based on assumptions and anecdotes as opposed to real comparative risk. If bicyclists *must* wear helmets, then pedestrians and motorists would have to as well. 

I have also always found helmets to be dangerous as they obscure peripheral vision, induce sweat to trickle into your eyes, and create a wind tunnel effect that further degrades your hearing.

It also creates fear about standards. Bicycling is supposed to be about freedom, not having to fear cops busting your chops for not having reflectors or a helmet or any other aspect of &quot;safety&quot; dreamed up by sanctimoniously security obsessed. It discourages free riding, the greatest pleasure that one can have as a cyclist. It also encourages the further escalation of our fear-based social policy, that has cocooned our children in bubblewrapped, while robbing them of precious freedoms of childhood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helmets are a case in point of the oversecuritization of bicycling based on assumptions and anecdotes as opposed to real comparative risk. If bicyclists *must* wear helmets, then pedestrians and motorists would have to as well. </p>
<p>I have also always found helmets to be dangerous as they obscure peripheral vision, induce sweat to trickle into your eyes, and create a wind tunnel effect that further degrades your hearing.</p>
<p>It also creates fear about standards. Bicycling is supposed to be about freedom, not having to fear cops busting your chops for not having reflectors or a helmet or any other aspect of &#8220;safety&#8221; dreamed up by sanctimoniously security obsessed. It discourages free riding, the greatest pleasure that one can have as a cyclist. It also encourages the further escalation of our fear-based social policy, that has cocooned our children in bubblewrapped, while robbing them of precious freedoms of childhood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim G</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/03/03/the-advocates-dilemma-a-national-bike-summit-warm-up/comment-page-1/#comment-229407</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 18:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commutebybike.com/?p=8858#comment-229407</guid>
		<description>I agree. I really believe education is the key, and that we should be educating kids as to the rules and best practices in grade school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I really believe education is the key, and that we should be educating kids as to the rules and best practices in grade school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Moses</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/03/03/the-advocates-dilemma-a-national-bike-summit-warm-up/comment-page-1/#comment-229405</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Moses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 17:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commutebybike.com/?p=8858#comment-229405</guid>
		<description>And Josh- I think that the NRA makes the same argument as bike advocates!  If everyone had a gun, we&#039;d all be safer.  I&#039;ll leave that debate for another blog, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Josh- I think that the NRA makes the same argument as bike advocates!  If everyone had a gun, we&#8217;d all be safer.  I&#8217;ll leave that debate for another blog, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Moses</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/03/03/the-advocates-dilemma-a-national-bike-summit-warm-up/comment-page-1/#comment-229404</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Moses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 17:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commutebybike.com/?p=8858#comment-229404</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Jim.  While I completely agree that we tend to sensationalize negative events, both in cycling and in general in the media, I don&#039;t think that we can focus solely on the positive aspects of riding as advocates and expect conditions to continue to improve.  I write about how cycling can improve your health, how convenient and easy it can be to combine bikes and public transportation, etc., and I think that it is very important to showcase the positives (and these topics are definitely more fun to write about).  However, we also need to continue to reach out to transportation planners, educators and the general public to secure funding for improved infrastructure, better bicycle commuter benefits (the US is way behind the UK in this initiative) and Safe Routes to Schools programs that not only improve conditions for current riders but also encourage other people to give riding a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Jim.  While I completely agree that we tend to sensationalize negative events, both in cycling and in general in the media, I don&#8217;t think that we can focus solely on the positive aspects of riding as advocates and expect conditions to continue to improve.  I write about how cycling can improve your health, how convenient and easy it can be to combine bikes and public transportation, etc., and I think that it is very important to showcase the positives (and these topics are definitely more fun to write about).  However, we also need to continue to reach out to transportation planners, educators and the general public to secure funding for improved infrastructure, better bicycle commuter benefits (the US is way behind the UK in this initiative) and Safe Routes to Schools programs that not only improve conditions for current riders but also encourage other people to give riding a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim G</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/03/03/the-advocates-dilemma-a-national-bike-summit-warm-up/comment-page-1/#comment-229399</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 04:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commutebybike.com/?p=8858#comment-229399</guid>
		<description>Another dilemma regarding cycling infrastructure (bike paths, bike lanes) is that while they may lead to a perception it makes cycling safer, the reverse can actually be true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another dilemma regarding cycling infrastructure (bike paths, bike lanes) is that while they may lead to a perception it makes cycling safer, the reverse can actually be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim G</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/03/03/the-advocates-dilemma-a-national-bike-summit-warm-up/comment-page-1/#comment-229398</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 04:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commutebybike.com/?p=8858#comment-229398</guid>
		<description>The debate regarding overemphasis on safety has been going on for years. The gist of it is this, by repeatedly emphasising safety and/or danger, we give the impression that cycling isn&#039;t as safe as it&#039;s proven to be, thereby discouraging those who mistakenly believe it&#039;s a dangerous activity. This is counterproductive on a number of levels, not the least of which is that the more cyclists we have riding, the safer it becomes as drivers become more aware of cyclists overall. Discouraging people from cycling actually makes it less safe.

As commuters or even casual cyclists who ride on the streets, we rarely mention or think about the times we spend just cycling on our merry way on a perfectly safe, uneventful, trip. The vast majority of the time. Uneventful being the key word. By a huge, huge margin, the overwhelming majority of rides on the street are uneventful, because we don&#039;t consider an everyday, mundane, safe ride to be eventful. Therefore, we rarely mention it.

But on the relatively rare occasion the ride is seen as &quot;eventful&quot; due to some perceived dangerous &quot;event&quot;, we tend to talk about it a lot to anyone who will listen - even writing letters to the papers, etc. Sometimes we do it to brag, by giving the impression we&#039;re somehow brave to be cycling on these dangerous streets. And on the extremely rare occasion when there is a serious &quot;accident&quot;, especially one fatal to the cyclist, it&#039;s all over the news. 

The exception can, ironically, be seen to be the rule.

The fact remains - cycling, and commuting by bike, is extremely safe. Usually mundane, though still very enjoyable, for me at least. And it has many benefits, especially healthy ones. That&#039;s what we need to concentrate on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The debate regarding overemphasis on safety has been going on for years. The gist of it is this, by repeatedly emphasising safety and/or danger, we give the impression that cycling isn&#8217;t as safe as it&#8217;s proven to be, thereby discouraging those who mistakenly believe it&#8217;s a dangerous activity. This is counterproductive on a number of levels, not the least of which is that the more cyclists we have riding, the safer it becomes as drivers become more aware of cyclists overall. Discouraging people from cycling actually makes it less safe.</p>
<p>As commuters or even casual cyclists who ride on the streets, we rarely mention or think about the times we spend just cycling on our merry way on a perfectly safe, uneventful, trip. The vast majority of the time. Uneventful being the key word. By a huge, huge margin, the overwhelming majority of rides on the street are uneventful, because we don&#8217;t consider an everyday, mundane, safe ride to be eventful. Therefore, we rarely mention it.</p>
<p>But on the relatively rare occasion the ride is seen as &#8220;eventful&#8221; due to some perceived dangerous &#8220;event&#8221;, we tend to talk about it a lot to anyone who will listen &#8211; even writing letters to the papers, etc. Sometimes we do it to brag, by giving the impression we&#8217;re somehow brave to be cycling on these dangerous streets. And on the extremely rare occasion when there is a serious &#8220;accident&#8221;, especially one fatal to the cyclist, it&#8217;s all over the news. </p>
<p>The exception can, ironically, be seen to be the rule.</p>
<p>The fact remains &#8211; cycling, and commuting by bike, is extremely safe. Usually mundane, though still very enjoyable, for me at least. And it has many benefits, especially healthy ones. That&#8217;s what we need to concentrate on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Lipton</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/03/03/the-advocates-dilemma-a-national-bike-summit-warm-up/comment-page-1/#comment-229394</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Lipton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 01:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commutebybike.com/?p=8858#comment-229394</guid>
		<description>I wonder how the NRA does it... They manage to emphasize gun safety without dampening the enthusiasm for gun purchasing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how the NRA does it&#8230; They manage to emphasize gun safety without dampening the enthusiasm for gun purchasing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tlp</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/03/03/the-advocates-dilemma-a-national-bike-summit-warm-up/comment-page-1/#comment-229389</link>
		<dc:creator>tlp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commutebybike.com/?p=8858#comment-229389</guid>
		<description>In my community there is a busy highway intersection that most commuters need to traverse.  You can say the &quot;safety&quot; needs improving at that intersection.  Or you can say we need better design to decrease the chances of a collision between a motorized vehicle and bicycle.  If motorized commuters can then see proper design they&#039;ll then more likely try bicycling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my community there is a busy highway intersection that most commuters need to traverse.  You can say the &#8220;safety&#8221; needs improving at that intersection.  Or you can say we need better design to decrease the chances of a collision between a motorized vehicle and bicycle.  If motorized commuters can then see proper design they&#8217;ll then more likely try bicycling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/03/03/the-advocates-dilemma-a-national-bike-summit-warm-up/comment-page-1/#comment-229388</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 20:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commutebybike.com/?p=8858#comment-229388</guid>
		<description>&quot;overemphasis on safety&quot; ... that&#039;s a new one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;overemphasis on safety&#8221; &#8230; that&#8217;s a new one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
