<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Californians: A Call to Action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/08/25/californians-a-call-to-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/08/25/californians-a-call-to-action/</link>
	<description>Tips, Hints, Reviews and Safety for Bike Commuters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:42:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BluesCat</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/08/25/californians-a-call-to-action/comment-page-1/#comment-401673</link>
		<dc:creator>BluesCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commutebybike.com/?p=13795#comment-401673</guid>
		<description>The purpose of the law is really to give a police officer a &quot;hook,&quot; a genuine infraction he can use to write up Dirtbag Cagers who terrorize bicyclists.

In a posting on my own blog, I reviewed the Arizona traffic deaths of bicyclists for calendar year 2009:  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://azbluescat.blogspot.com/2010/09/shocking-arizona-statistics.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Shocking Arizona Statistics&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.

The original reason for the post was to refute this fantasy that ONLY around 4% of bicyclists who are killed in traffic accidents are struck from behind, it&#039;s actually closer to 40%! But a side revelation is how difficult it is determining whether it was the driver or the cyclist who was at fault.

In a confrontation between a bike and a car which results in a fatality, it isn&#039;t hard to guess who dies. A lot of times there are no other witnesses, and since the dead don&#039;t testify, and a driver will hardly say anything to accept blame if he or she has KILLED someone, it also isn&#039;t hard to guess who &quot;gets the blame.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The purpose of the law is really to give a police officer a &#8220;hook,&#8221; a genuine infraction he can use to write up Dirtbag Cagers who terrorize bicyclists.</p>
<p>In a posting on my own blog, I reviewed the Arizona traffic deaths of bicyclists for calendar year 2009:<br />
<a href="http://azbluescat.blogspot.com/2010/09/shocking-arizona-statistics.html" rel="nofollow"><i>Shocking Arizona Statistics</i></a>.</p>
<p>The original reason for the post was to refute this fantasy that ONLY around 4% of bicyclists who are killed in traffic accidents are struck from behind, it&#8217;s actually closer to 40%! But a side revelation is how difficult it is determining whether it was the driver or the cyclist who was at fault.</p>
<p>In a confrontation between a bike and a car which results in a fatality, it isn&#8217;t hard to guess who dies. A lot of times there are no other witnesses, and since the dead don&#8217;t testify, and a driver will hardly say anything to accept blame if he or she has KILLED someone, it also isn&#8217;t hard to guess who &#8220;gets the blame.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaime Roberto</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/08/25/californians-a-call-to-action/comment-page-1/#comment-400684</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaime Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 02:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commutebybike.com/?p=13795#comment-400684</guid>
		<description>I have mixed feelings about this.  

First, it&#039;s worth noting that the proposed law has a couple of details that are left out of the summary description.  1) It applies only on highways (which I assume means what it says, but maybe it&#039;s a legal term of art I&#039;m unaware of).  2) It explicitly allows cars to cross a double yellow to give the cyclist room, which I think is a good thing.

On the other hand I can see this as giving cyclists untouchable status allowing some of the less considerate to ride side by side and blocking traffic.  I know it&#039;s legal, but I don&#039;t think it should be encouraged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have mixed feelings about this.  </p>
<p>First, it&#8217;s worth noting that the proposed law has a couple of details that are left out of the summary description.  1) It applies only on highways (which I assume means what it says, but maybe it&#8217;s a legal term of art I&#8217;m unaware of).  2) It explicitly allows cars to cross a double yellow to give the cyclist room, which I think is a good thing.</p>
<p>On the other hand I can see this as giving cyclists untouchable status allowing some of the less considerate to ride side by side and blocking traffic.  I know it&#8217;s legal, but I don&#8217;t think it should be encouraged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/08/25/californians-a-call-to-action/comment-page-1/#comment-400587</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commutebybike.com/?p=13795#comment-400587</guid>
		<description>I am a native Nevada and we have a expansive/expensive bike trail system along the flood wash channels including bike bridges over dirt washes and roads. When I ride all I see are homeless alcoholics using the bike bridges as a sun block. More and more people are riding bikes because of the &quot;recover summer&quot;. These new riders do not know the rules/etiquette or DEFENSIVE riding. A new rider jumped out in front of me on a blind corner (did not look in me face). If you want to cycle then you need to have a social security number and a thought process.
Love COMMUTE BY BIKE.com
Thank You</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a native Nevada and we have a expansive/expensive bike trail system along the flood wash channels including bike bridges over dirt washes and roads. When I ride all I see are homeless alcoholics using the bike bridges as a sun block. More and more people are riding bikes because of the &#8220;recover summer&#8221;. These new riders do not know the rules/etiquette or DEFENSIVE riding. A new rider jumped out in front of me on a blind corner (did not look in me face). If you want to cycle then you need to have a social security number and a thought process.<br />
Love COMMUTE BY BIKE.com<br />
Thank You</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Connelly</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/08/25/californians-a-call-to-action/comment-page-1/#comment-400210</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Connelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commutebybike.com/?p=13795#comment-400210</guid>
		<description>If a collision occurs it makes it, in theory, much easier to assign fault to the driver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a collision occurs it makes it, in theory, much easier to assign fault to the driver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Love</title>
		<link>http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/08/25/californians-a-call-to-action/comment-page-1/#comment-399693</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commutebybike.com/?p=13795#comment-399693</guid>
		<description>Nice in theory, but how is it going to be enforced?

Why do I suspect that this is just going to be another &quot;feel good&quot; law that won&#039;t be enforced and therefore will provide zero benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice in theory, but how is it going to be enforced?</p>
<p>Why do I suspect that this is just going to be another &#8220;feel good&#8221; law that won&#8217;t be enforced and therefore will provide zero benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
